Whoopi Goldberg has done it again—this time, the Hollywood icon has turned her passion for women’s empowerment into a game-changing media project. Last week, Goldberg officially launched the All Women’s Sports Network (AWSN), a 24/7 global channel dedicated entirely to women’s sports. But beneath the applause lies a brewing storm, as insiders allege that AWSN’s policies could controversially exclude trans athletes, sparking heated debates in the sports and LGBTQ+ communities.

A Vision for Women’s Sports—or Division?

AWSN, which is broadcast in 65 countries, aims to elevate the coverage of women’s sports, showcasing everything from the WNBA to international tennis tournaments. Goldberg, known for her outspoken advocacy, described the channel as “a space where women athletes can finally take center stage.”

But critics are pointing to an allegedly exclusionary clause in the network’s mission. Reports suggest that AWSN is adopting strict biological definitions of “women” in its programming—a move that could sideline prominent trans athletes like swimmer Lia Thomas and boxer Imane Khelif.

While Goldberg has not directly addressed these claims, her comments during the launch event raised eyebrows. “Sports should be fair, and fairness means ensuring that women—biological women—compete on an even playing field,” she said. “This isn’t about exclusion; it’s about preserving the integrity of women’s sports.”

Dividing Lines in the Debate

The potential exclusion has reignited a fiery debate over trans inclusion in women’s sports. Advocates for trans athletes, including LGBTQ+ organizations, argue that Goldberg’s stance could set a dangerous precedent. “By creating a platform that excludes trans women, AWSN sends a harmful message to all marginalized athletes,” one activist tweeted.

On the other hand, supporters of Goldberg’s approach praise her for taking a stand in what they view as an increasingly fraught issue. “Women’s sports have been overshadowed for too long. This isn’t transphobia—it’s about giving women the opportunities they deserve,” said a spokesperson for a women’s rights advocacy group.

Backlash and Boycotts?

Already, the controversy has sparked calls for boycotts of AWSN from prominent LGBTQ+ organizations. “No network that claims to represent women should build itself on the backs of exclusion and discrimination,” said a spokesperson for a trans advocacy group.

Goldberg, however, seems unfazed. “I’ve dealt with backlash my entire career,” she told reporters. “If you’re not making people think, then you’re not doing anything worthwhile.”

Moving Forward

The debate surrounding AWSN highlights the increasingly polarized conversation about gender and sports. While Goldberg’s efforts to spotlight women’s sports are groundbreaking, her network may become a lightning rod for larger cultural battles.

As AWSN continues to expand its programming, all eyes will be on Goldberg to see how she navigates the growing criticism. One thing is certain: the dialogue she has ignited is far from over.