Last week, Popcorn Planet reported that Meghan Markle appeared to have been removed from the upcoming Invictus Games. This claim was initially met with skepticism, with many dismissing it as clickbait. However, recent changes to the Invictus Games website suggest that the report was accurate. The site no longer mentions Meghan Markle’s involvement, particularly in the closing ceremony. Previously, the website had announced her as a key figure alongside Prince Harry, describing her as the “esteemed presence” who would host a poignant segment.

 

 

Popcorn Planet’s host, Andy Signor, and co-host, Steph the Altar Nerd, highlighted the sudden removal of references to Markle. They noted that her name and the detailed descriptions of her role had been replaced, leaving no indication of her participation. This change sparked speculation about the reasons behind her exclusion. Some suggest that Markle’s recent focus on attending high-profile events like Beyoncé concerts, and Prince Harry’s interest in sports events such as watching Lionel Messi play, might indicate their shifting priorities.

 

Further speculation arose around the timing of the announcement and the subsequent backlash. Critics, including royal commentator Angela Levin, had harshly criticized Markle’s planned involvement, questioning her authenticity and relevance to the Invictus Games’ message of courage and resilience. Levin argued that Markle’s presence was hypocritical, given her lack of connection to the values represented by the games.

In response to the controversy, reports now suggest that Markle will stay home with her children, a narrative that some perceive as an attempt to mitigate the backlash. This excuse mirrors her previous absence from King Charles’s coronation, where it was claimed she stayed home for childcare reasons, despite having nannies and the availability of her time for other high-profile events.

 

The removal of Markle’s name from the Invictus Games website might also signal a broader distancing of the games’ organizers from the Sussexes. Reports indicate that future games, such as the one planned in Canada, might exclude Harry and Meghan to avoid the event becoming overly associated with them, rather than focusing on the veterans it aims to honor.

 

 

This situation underscores a growing divide between the Invictus Games’ mission and the public perception of Harry and Meghan. As the games continue to emphasize the achievements and stories of veteran athletes, there is a clear intention to separate the event from the personal narratives of the Sussexes, ensuring that the focus remains on the competitors and their inspiring journeys.