According to Paulm, Colombia’s Vice President, Francia Márquez, has made a sharp demand for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to reimburse the substantial costs incurred during their recent ill-fated visit to the country.
The controversy centers on the audacious claim that the couple’s tour—intended to spotlight social issues—cost a mere £45,000 (around $70,000). This figure has been widely criticized as a gross underestimation of the actual expenses involved
The uproar began when it was revealed that the costs associated with the visit vastly exceeded the official figures. Critics argue that the listed amount is far too low to cover the extensive security measures, accommodation, and logistical arrangements required for such a high-profile visit.
The Sussexes, who were reportedly not officially invited by the Colombian government, allegedly financed the trip themselves, further fueling the fire.
Francia Márquez, whose political reputation is already under scrutiny, now finds herself in the eye of a storm. The claim that the entire visit cost just £45,000 has been met with widespread skepticism. To put this into perspective, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s entourage included over 20 staff members, plus a substantial security detail.
Additionally, their visit required coordination with 3,000 soldiers and multiple security agencies, not to mention the helicopter transport between locations. Given these factors, the real cost of the visit is estimated to be several million dollars.
The narrative has shifted dramatically from a focus on tourism to a debate over the true nature and cost of the trip. Márquez’s attempt to downplay the expenses has sparked outrage among the Colombian public and political opponents.
Many are demanding a detailed breakdown of the expenditures, questioning whether the figures provided are a deliberate attempt to mislead or reflect serious mismanagement of funds.
The backlash against Márquez intensified as it became clear that the declared amount was insufficient to cover even basic security costs.
This situation has led to widespread speculation about where the real money went, with critics pondering whether funds were diverted from the UK’s Invictus Games Foundation or other charitable contributions made by Harry and Meghan.
The discrepancy in financial reporting raises serious questions about the integrity of the financial disclosures related to the tour. Adding to the drama, the Colombian public has expressed outrage over the perceived misuse of funds.
Protests have erupted, with citizens demanding accountability from both the government and the visiting royals. The discontent has been exacerbated by revelations of poorly organized events and inadequate accommodation, further tarnishing the image of the visit.
The entire debacle has cast a shadow over Harry and Meghan’s attempt to use their platform for social good. Instead of fostering positive change, their visit has become a symbol of financial mismanagement and political scandal.
The couple’s alleged role in financing their own trip, coupled with the lack of clarity surrounding the costs, has only fueled public skepticism. The fallout from Harry and Meghan’s Colombian tour is far from over.
Francia Márquez’s demand for repayment highlights significant discrepancies in financial reporting and has ignited a broader discussion about the true costs of high-profile visits. As the situation develops, the public and political spheres will undoubtedly continue to scrutinize the actions of both the Colombian government and the Sussexes.
