Prince Harry has placed his wife Meghan Markle’s royal titles in jeopardy following a startling revelation in a recent documentary. In the documentary, Harry disclosed that he would never bring Meghan back to the UK due to ongoing security concerns.

This confession has prompted royal experts to voice their apprehensions regarding Meghan’s royal status.

Reports have surfaced suggesting that Meghan’s political ambitions could further complicate matters for the royal family.

Royal commentator Natasha Livingston has voiced concerns that if Meghan were to retain her title while pursuing a political career, it would create a significant issue for the royals, who traditionally avoid political involvement. Livingston remarked that having a royal title linked to any political office would be problematic for the monarchy.

The controversy has intensified with the recent news that President Joe Biden has ended his re-election campaign and endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris as his successor.

This development has led to speculation about Meghan’s career moves. Livingston explained in a conversation with Palace Confidential that retaining her title while engaging in politics would be a real “headache” for the royals.

Harry’s comments about Meghan’s safety have also added fuel to the fire. During the ITV documentary “Tabloids on Trial,” Harry expressed his concerns about the dangers Meghan could face if they were to return to the UK, citing threats such as knife or acid attacks.

He emphasized that even a single “lone actor” influenced by media coverage could pose a risk. Harry’s fear that it remains unsafe for Meghan in the UK has been a major point of contention.

In a recent national TV interview, Harry made headlines by claiming that Meghan’s fear of violent attacks, such as being assaulted with a knife or acid, is a primary reason for not returning to the UK.

This statement has sparked significant debate and skepticism. Critics argue that Harry’s assertions might be exaggerated and serve primarily to garner sympathy and justify their request for taxpayer-funded security.

Despite Harry’s warnings, there have been no documented incidents involving knife or acid attacks against the couple during their UK visits since they stepped down from royal duties.

This lack of evidence has led some commentators to suggest that Harry’s statements might be more about manipulating public perception rather than addressing real threats. Social media user @RoyalSage commented that the fears about “lone actors” might be a tactic to support their security claims.

Furthermore, despite their concerns for Meghan’s safety in the UK, Harry and Meghan have traveled to countries with higher security risks, such as Nigeria. Critics argue that the negative press surrounding the couple is largely self-inflicted, resulting from their public statements and behavior.

According to the Royal News Network, Harry’s attempts to draw parallels between phone hacking and critical coverage of Meghan are seen as efforts to shift the narrative and avoid accountability for their actions.

The negative press is viewed by some as a consequence of Harry and Meghan’s own actions rather than any illegal media practices.