Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have recently faced significant criticism, with commentators and royal experts alleging that the couple often shifts blame onto others rather than accepting responsibility for their own actions. This tendency has sparked widespread discussion and analysis, suggesting that the couple’s frequent portrayals of themselves as victims are part of a broader pattern of deflecting accountability.

Royal commentator Angela Levin criticized Prince Harry for what she describes as his habit of blaming others while failing to take responsibility for his own decisions. Levin contends that this behavior is not limited to Harry but extends to Meghan Markle as well, who she believes shares a similar tendency to place blame externally. Levin argues that this pattern is a strategic way to elicit sympathy and maintain a narrative of being wronged by external forces, such as the media or the royal family​.

The criticism intensified following Harry’s memoir “Spare” and the couple’s various media appearances, where they frequently discussed their grievances with the royal family and the British press. The couple’s narrative often paints a picture of an unwelcoming and hostile environment, leading to their departure from royal duties. Critics argue that while some of their complaints may be valid, the consistent portrayal of themselves as victims without acknowledging any personal missteps has led to a perception of them as avoiding personal accountability​​.

This behavior can be understood through the lens of psychological research on blame-shifting. Studies suggest that individuals who struggle with emotion regulation are more likely to project blame onto others as a coping mechanism. This projection helps them manage negative emotions like guilt, shame, or anger. By blaming external parties, they can alleviate these uncomfortable feelings and protect their self-image. In this context, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s actions could be seen as a defense mechanism to shield themselves from negative emotions​​.

Daniela Elser, another royal expert, has expressed similar sentiments, noting that Harry and Meghan’s public statements often imply that they bear no responsibility for the controversies and conflicts in which they are involved. Elser points out that the couple’s frequent references to being misunderstood or unfairly treated by others overlook their role in these situations. This narrative of perpetual victimhood not only alienates potential supporters but also raises questions about their ability to self-reflect and grow from their experiences​​.

In conclusion, the criticism leveled at Prince Harry and Meghan Markle for their tendency to blame others reflects broader societal expectations around accountability and self-awareness. While they have faced undeniable challenges, the consistent externalization of blame risks overshadowing their legitimate grievances and reducing public sympathy. As public figures, their handling of personal and professional challenges will continue to be scrutinized, and their responses to these criticisms may shape their public perception in the years to come.