A’ja Wilson in Serious Hot Water After Friend’s UNCONSCIOUS TWEET About Fever’s Kristy Wallace

The WNBA has seen its fair share of controversy, but A’ja Wilson is now at the center of one that she likely never intended to be a part of. A single tweet from one of her close friends, Dolores Mayi Jordan, has set off a firestorm of backlash, dragging Wilson into a situation that has fans and analysts questioning not just the intent behind the words, but the growing tension within the league.

Was this just an ill-advised post, or is there something deeper beneath the surface?

A Tweet That Sparked Outrage

The controversy began when Dolores Mayi Jordan took to social media to make a questionable remark about Indiana Fever guard Kristy Wallace, who is notably absent from the team. Jordan’s tweet hinted at skepticism regarding players sitting out games, calling it “sketchy” and suggesting that in any other situation, there would be an “investigation.”

At first, the comment seemed directed at a larger conversation about injuries and player absences in the WNBA. But soon after, it became clear that Kristy Wallace was one of the players referenced in this criticism, leading to an immediate backlash.

Why? Because Wallace’s absence is not a mystery.

The Real Story Behind Kristy Wallace’s Absence

Wallace has been dealing with an undeniable personal tragedy—the passing of her mother after a long battle with cancer.

This is not a case of a player sitting out due to vague “personal reasons” or strategic load management. It is a deeply human situation, one that should have been met with compassion. The lack of awareness in Jordan’s post—and its unintended insensitivity—immediately turned the situation into something far bigger than just a comment about basketball.

A’ja Wilson’s Role in the Controversy

A’ja Wilson, a respected leader in the WNBA, was quickly pulled into the fray. Fans and critics alike began asking the same question: Did Wilson see the tweet before it was posted? Does she agree with the sentiment? Why hasn’t she spoken out?

To be clear, Wilson did not make the tweet herself. However, in today’s hyper-connected world, the company you keep matters.

Jordan is not just a random fan—she is one of Wilson’s close friends and someone who regularly engages in WNBA discussions online. This raises concerns about whether Wilson’s inner circle shares a disregard for player struggles—something completely at odds with the league’s culture of support and unity.

If Wilson does not agree with the tweet, fans argue she should publicly denounce it and clarify her stance. If she remains silent, does that imply agreement?

The Internet Erupts

As expected, social media went into complete chaos following the tweet.

Some fans immediately defended Wilson, arguing that she shouldn’t be held responsible for something she didn’t post.
Others called for an apology, stating that even if the intent wasn’t malicious, the comment was out of line given Wallace’s situation.
A significant portion of fans expressed disappointment, pointing out that a leader like Wilson should be fostering support, not controversy.

The tweet was deleted, but not before screenshots flooded Twitter, Instagram, and sports forums.

How the Fever Roster Changes Factor In

It’s important to note that Wallace’s absence is just one part of a larger shake-up in Indiana. The Fever roster has undergone massive changes, with more than half the players from 2024 no longer on the team.

Wallace’s future with the team remains unclear, and while some speculate that her absence could lead to an eventual departure, the reality is that no decision has been made.

Given the dramatic roster overhaul, tensions are already high within the franchise. A tweet like this—especially from someone connected to another high-profile player—only adds fuel to the fire.

Where Does A’ja Wilson Go From Here?

So far, Wilson has not publicly addressed the controversy.

If she chooses to stay silent, she risks allowing the narrative to spiral out of control, making it seem like she condones the tweet.

If she speaks out, she has a chance to set the record straight, distancing herself from the comment and emphasizing the need for respect within the league.

This situation is a reminder of the influence public figures hold—even through their friends and associates. In a league that prides itself on unity and empowerment, moments like these can divide or bring players together.