A recent discussion within women’s basketball circles has sparked a significant debate: Can USC’s Juju Watkins be considered the next Caitlin Clark? While both players are immensely talented, many believe comparing Watkins to Clark may be premature or even misplaced.
While Watkins continues to build her profile, many point to Clark’s unparalleled drawing power and magnetic presence on the court as evidence of her “generational” status. Clark’s games, regardless of location, consistently sell out, and her fanbase extends well beyond Iowa, making her a unique figure in women’s sports. Some observers have noted that Clark’s appeal isn’t merely a product of skill but also of timing, visibility, and an almost unprecedented ability to energize a broad audience.
The USC-Ole Miss game itself raised questions about the current state of women’s basketball viewership. Despite being a high-profile match-up between two top-20 teams, it was not widely promoted, and even seasoned fans were unaware of its scheduling. Moreover, the game’s quality came under criticism as both teams struggled with shooting percentages and turnovers, further highlighting the differences between Clark’s impact on the sport and the challenges other players face in reaching her level of influence.
Watkins has shown immense promise and has the potential to become a formidable figure in the sport. However, the push to label her as “the next Caitlin Clark” is something many basketball analysts are hesitant to endorse. They argue that truly generational talents, like Clark, emerge rarely and organically, not through comparisons or promotions. For now, Watkins’ path remains her own to define, and she continues to be a young star to watch in the evolving landscape of women’s basketball.
