WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert‘s recent remarks regarding the heated rivalry between college basketball stars Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese have drawn widespread criticism from players and the WNBA Players Association (WNBPA).
Engelbert‘s comments, made during a CNBC interview, have sparked discussions about race and sportsmanship within the league.
Angel Reese reveals how she splurges and manages her money
During an appearance on CNBC’s “Power Lunch” on Monday, Engelbert was asked to address the growing toxicity between the fan bases of Clark and Reese, two prominent players known for their fierce rivalry.
Instead of tackling the issue head-on, Engelbert sidestepped the question and delivered a broad response about the intersection of sports, culture, and entertainment.
Breanna Stewart hit out at the comments
When asked about the “darker turn” of fandom surrounding the rivalry, Engelbert shifted the focus.
“The WNBA players are really looked at now as cultural icons.”
She continued to emphasize the league’s position at the crossroads of “culture, sports, fashion, and music.” Engelbert drew parallels to the historic rivalry between Larry Bird and Magic Johnson, citing the importance of rivalry in sports.
“You need rivalry. That’s what makes people watch,” Engelbert added.
However, her failure to directly address the racial undertones and fan hostility sparked backlash among the players and WNBPA leaders.
Prominent players, including New York Liberty star Breanna Stewart, expressed their disappointment following the interview.
“It’s disappointing to hear because the fans have surged behind Caitlin and Angel, but also brought race into the conversation, which has no place in our sport,” Stewart explained.
Angel Reese, one of the athletes at the center of the controversy, echoed similar sentiments, feeling that the racial narrative overshadowed the talent and competitive spirit of the game.
Terri Jackson, executive director of the WNBPA, issued a sharp rebuke of Engelbert‘s comments, criticizing the commissioner for not adequately addressing the real issue at hand.
