NBC Reporter UNDER FIRE For BIAS EPISODE On Twitter After HATING On Caitlin Clark!

Fans Outraged Over Questionable Journalism and Anti-Clark Bias

A storm of controversy has erupted after NBC sports reporter Natalie Esquire took to Twitter with a bold claim that has set social media ablaze. Esquire, a known WNBA analyst, made waves by stating that Chelsea Gray—not Caitlin Clark—is the best point guard in the league. What followed was an all-out debate, with fans, analysts, and critics questioning the motive behind Esquire’s take and calling her out for bias against the Iowa sensation.

For a league that has seen a massive boost in attention thanks to Clark’s historic performances, the timing of this take felt calculated. But was Esquire speaking objectively, or was this just another example of media figures diminishing Clark’s impact?

Natalie Esquire’s Controversial Statement Sparks Outrage

Esquire’s original tweet was short but explosive:

“Chelsea Gray is the best point guard in the WNBA. That hasn’t changed because she had a down year returning from injury. The disrespect on her name was ridiculous.”

Immediately, fans and analysts flooded her mentions, questioning how she could make such a claim when Clark, in her rookie season, was statistically superior in nearly every category.

Let’s talk numbers.

Clark’s rookie campaign saw her average 19.2 points, 8.4 assists, and 5.7 rebounds per game while leading Indiana to its best season in years. Meanwhile, even in Gray’s best statistical season, she never reached Clark’s level in points or assists.

Comparing the numbers directly:

Caitlin Clark (Rookie Year): 19.2 PPG, 8.4 APG, 5.7 RPG, 1.3 SPG
Chelsea Gray (Best Season): 15.3 PPG, 7.3 APG, 4.0 RPG, 1.4 SPG

Not only does Clark surpass Gray in points and assists, but she does so while carrying a team that had been struggling for years. Meanwhile, Gray has always played alongside multiple All-Stars, including A’ja Wilson, Kelsey Plum, and Jackie Young.

So, what exactly was Esquire basing her claim on?

Fans and Analysts Call Out the Bias

The backlash was swift. Fans were quick to question Esquire’s objectivity, with many accusing her of pushing an anti-Clark narrative. The conversation quickly turned to a broader discussion about media bias, with some users pointing out that Esquire has a history of downplaying Clark’s success.

One fan responded:

“Caitlin Clark is literally rewriting the record books, yet people like Natalie Esquire will do mental gymnastics to say someone else is better. Just admit you don’t like her and move on.”

Another tweeted:

“If Chelsea Gray is the best point guard in the WNBA, why hasn’t she ever put up Clark’s numbers? And let’s not forget—she’s always played on a stacked team. Meanwhile, Clark is carrying the Fever by herself.”

Even respected sports analysts chimed in. Mike Clark, a WNBA analyst, posted:

“Chelsea Gray is a great player, no doubt. But let’s not pretend she’s better than Caitlin Clark. Numbers don’t lie. This is why people don’t take WNBA media seriously.”

The debate even spilled into discussions about journalism ethics, with some questioning whether Esquire’s post was a genuine analysis or just a biased take to spark engagement.

Esquire Claps Back But Digs a Deeper Hole

As the backlash grew, Esquire didn’t back down. Instead, she doubled down, responding to critics with tweets like:

“I didn’t say Caitlin Clark wasn’t great. I just said Chelsea Gray is the best PG in the league. Y’all can’t handle differing opinions?”

But the problem wasn’t differing opinions—it was the blatant disregard for facts. Even when confronted with statistical evidence, Esquire refused to acknowledge that Clark had outperformed Gray in nearly every measurable category.

At one point, a fan asked her directly:

“So you’re saying Chelsea Gray would put up better numbers than Clark if they swapped teams?”

Esquire’s response?

“It’s not all about stats. Leadership matters.”

A vague, convenient answer that ignored the original question.

The Bigger Issue: Why Does WNBA Media Keep Trying to Downplay Caitlin Clark?

This isn’t the first time a media figure has attempted to diminish Clark’s achievements.

From ESPN analysts claiming she’s overhyped to reporters nitpicking her every move, there has been a clear pattern of resistance from certain corners of WNBA media when it comes to acknowledging her greatness.

Why?

Some believe it’s jealousy. Clark’s arrival in the WNBA has completely changed the league’s landscape, bringing in record-breaking viewership and revenue. Meanwhile, long-time players and analysts who have covered the league for years suddenly feel overshadowed.

Others think it’s about identity politics. Clark’s rise has created uncomfortable conversations in the sports world, particularly regarding how certain players are covered and celebrated compared to others.

Regardless of the reason, the reality remains: Caitlin Clark is the face of women’s basketball right now, and no amount of biased reporting will change that.

What Happens Next?

After the firestorm on Twitter, many fans are calling for Esquire to be held accountable. Some have even suggested that NBC should reconsider her role as a reporter if she continues to push misleading narratives.

But let’s be honest—she’s probably not going anywhere. Controversy generates clicks, and as long as people are talking about her tweets, she’s getting exactly what she wants.

The real question is, will she learn from this? Will WNBA media as a whole start giving Clark the respect she deserves, or will they continue this bizarre campaign to discredit her?

One thing is certain—Clark doesn’t need their validation. She lets her game do the talking.

And as long as she keeps dominating, the attempts to rewrite reality will keep failing.