Tonight, we’re delving into the revived controversy surrounding Prince Harry’s U.S. visa status—a story brought to light by our dedicated Royal Correspondent, Kinsey Schofield, all the way from Los Angeles. As many will recall, Harry’s visa issues began when he first applied to live in the U.S., raising questions about his eligibility due to past admissions of drug use. Now, this longstanding debate has reignited, and Kinsey has uncovered major new developments.

Here’s the backstory: typically, anyone applying for a U.S. residency visa must declare any past illegal drug use. For average citizens, an admission of drug use often leads to denial of entry. But high-profile individuals sometimes seem to receive special treatment—a point the Heritage Foundation, a Washington-based think tank, is pressing with renewed vigor. According to them, Prince Harry either admitted to past drug use and was given an unusual pass, or he didn’t declare it at all, which would typically disqualify him.

After a long-winded legal battle over transparency, a judge previously ruled in Harry’s favor, allowing him to stay in the U.S. without disclosing his visa application details. However, new revelations show that the Biden administration allegedly made a private submission to the court just before the judge’s ruling. This covert involvement has the Heritage Foundation alleging undue interference by the administration, accusing them of potentially manipulating the judicial process to keep Harry in the States.

The stakes are high. The Heritage Foundation is demanding to unseal Prince Harry’s visa records, arguing it’s a matter of transparency, a value rooted in American governance. They claim that this recent intervention prevented them from presenting a fair case. Now, the question remains: will the court reconsider and vacate the previous judgment, potentially reopening the debate over whether Prince Harry’s residency in the U.S. is valid?

Kinsey sheds light on this latest twist, noting the Heritage Foundation’s main aim isn’t to remove Prince Harry from the U.S. but to ensure all applicants are treated equally. They argue that the American people have the right to know if any special privileges were granted to a public figure.

But there’s more to this intrigue. The controversy surrounding Harry and Meghan isn’t confined to Washington; their Montecito community is also buzzing. Recently, The Montecito Journal—the beloved local paper of many A-list residents—reported on the strained relationship between the royal couple. Rumors have started circulating about their struggles, including some from past Royal insiders, sparking fresh debate over their plans and position within Hollywood.

And as America gears up for the next presidential election, there are even whispers of potential future ramifications if Donald Trump returns to office. Trump has hinted in the past that he’s no fan of the Duke and Duchess, meaning a new administration could see Harry’s visa case take an even sharper turn.

So, what’s next? Kinsey will continue following this story with her usual insight and tenacity, as all eyes are on both the courts and the couple’s moves in Hollywood. This could very well be the start of a new chapter in Harry’s American journey—one with implications not just for the former royal but for immigration transparency at large.