In a provocative statement that has sparked widespread debate, conservative commentator Candace Owens has proposed banning WNBA star Brittney Griner from international competition. Owens, known for her outspoken views, made the controversial remark in a recent interview, suggesting that patriotism should take precedence over athletic achievement.

“I would rather have a player who represents America and loves America than a medal,” Owens asserted. “We would rather have the less safe player who is the most patriotic. It is not about winning or losing; it is about representing the country and the honor of the country.”

Owens’ proposal is rooted in her belief that Griner’s actions and stance do not align with her vision of American values. Griner, a prominent figure in women’s basketball, has been outspoken on various social issues and has faced criticism from some quarters for her views. Owens argues that true representation of American values involves prioritizing patriotism and national pride over personal accolades.

The suggestion has elicited a range of reactions. Supporters of Owens argue that her stance is a call for greater alignment between athletes’ public personas and national values. Critics, however, see the proposal as an attack on Griner’s freedom to express her beliefs and a dismissal of the athlete’s significant contributions to the sport and her country.

The debate underscores a broader conversation about the role of athletes in political and social discourse. As Griner continues to be a prominent figure in both sports and activism, the discussion about her role and representation is likely to persist.

As the conversation evolves, it remains to be seen how this debate will influence public opinion and policy regarding athletes and their representation of national values on the global stage.